Monthly Archive for October, 2010

Why aren’t mobile customer valued?


My mobile contract with was up for renewal this week so I had a look at the deals I was being offered to retain my long-running contract – almost every offer was worse than if I’d walked in off the street.

At my request, the “Customer Retention” department rang me and encouraged me to become a new customer of theirs; they seemed a little taken aback when I said that if they don’t value seven years of then I wouldn’t either.

A quick Google to find out what the churn rate is in the found this article from three years ago – at that time churn rate was around 40% and rising rapidly. And the reasons why people move on:

  • Not being recognised as a valued customer (55%);
  • Unhelpful staff (47%);
  • Ineffective call centres (42%)

At some time over the last year I’ve counted myself in all three groups so it seems little has changed.

The annual quality survey just published by the Said Business School and Cisco ranks the UK’s mobile services as 24th in their table – a lower ranking than fixed-line which isn’t anything to boast about either.

So with a relatively low-quality technical offering and a culture of not valuing customers, why would anyone stay with their mobile operator?

Where’s the demand for “superfast” broadband?


As we start to debate what “superfast” might mean in a context, too often people are returning to the bigger “why” questions: Why do we need to invest at all? where’s the demand?

The technology sector is an example of where Saye’s economic principles tend to trump Adam Smith; where tend’s to find its own demand rather than Smith’s assertion that proven demand being the overriding principle for creating supply. How could we know we all wanted Skype before we had the infrastructure on which someone could develop it, or that Youtube would become the second biggest search engine after Google?

A common rebuttal is that this is dangerous “field of dreams”, “dot.com bubble” thinking but that would be to over simplifying things, although it must be acknowledged that the evidence of daft investments in the sector are rife and nowhere more than in the UK; even today, try saying “boo” to a venture capitalist if you don’t believe me.

Clearly not all things create demand which is why we need smart people thinking about this – smart innovators and not the kind of daft people who genuinely thought that the rules which govern the economics of the were fundamentally different from the economics of everything else – re-read “Blown to Bits” by Evans and Wurster if you need a refresher.

Smart people in the technology sector come in two flavours – technically smart and commercially smart – and its really important never to mix them up!!

Technically smart people innovate incrementally – eureka moments rarely happen in reality, with most of the breakthroughs coming from close collaborations and earlier research. Those collaborations are not just with their peers but also with commercial organisations that have the to drive innovation but who need a market to address. IBM, for example, has announced a major new R&D facility in Australia and the Government’s is cited is as a major influencing factor; IBM can see that the mere existence of the NBN will lead to new opportunities created by innovators free to imagine and with the tools to invest. The R&D money will seek out places with the imagination and the market. For a country which can’t make the case its likely to become a slow lingering death.

Commercially smart people on the other hand don’t just assume that supply will find its own demand unaided, they reach out to the market to understand how it might be most readily consumed. This is arguably the most critical factor which separates successful fibre projects from those which fail.

In the UK we still present superfast broadband as just that – a very quick pipe to the internet. This kind of message will appeal to the perhaps 10% of society, the early adopters, but the rest of the market is likely to wait until someone delivers a service which captures their imagination – the next Skype or Youtube. So when BT and Virgin say superfast broadband is a risky investment which has so far demonstrated low take-up levels, no-one should be surprised – they’ve not given anyone a reason to buy it.

Contrast it with some of the more successful European projects, where take-up can be north of 80%. A common factor among these is a commercial message that engages people and not just the early adopters – they give all kinds of people reasons to take a service. It could be healthcare, better or more local TV, gaming, education – any number of things which smart commercial people left to imagine ought to be able to conjure up. In fact one of the most successful projects I’ve visited makes a point of never mentioning bandwidth and rarely mentions the internet.

The UK is one of the most technically adept and gadget conscious markets in the world. So if someone tells you there is no demand for superfast broadband, look at them with pity and move on – they don’t have the imagination!

The Reach of BT’s FttX announcements


Now that BT’s has made its sixth set of announcements I decided to map the expected coverage of BT’s FttX roll-out so far. Below is a mini gallery of the UK coverage and for my neighbours in Oxfordshire (click on each image to load larger version)

The predicted coverage of BT\'s FttX announcements up to Phase 6 - September 2010 The impact of BT\'s FttX announcements on Oxfordshire up to September 2010

The good news, for me at least, is that I should have FttC in time for Christmas next year and since I can see the green cabinet from my office window hopefully it will make a major difference.

Generally, however, the roll-out seems to be following the DCLG model of deployments for 65% coverage, which for my neighbours means we may reasonably expect to see Carterton, Eynsham, Didcot Wallingford, Kidlington and Woodstock announced in later phases – although probably not much more for Oxfordshire.

Of course this is where maps can provide a tilted picture – although the area covered is still very small, the population is disproportionately large as these are typically areas with very high population density. By my calculation from ONS data and trying to predict the exchange areas, it looks like the announcements so far will reach around 24% of homes in England and Wales – it sounds like we are about a third of the way through BT’s  announcements.

As a personal comment on progress – BT announcements have recently been good news which few could really criticize, so its a shame that they had to spoil it by announcing a competition for qualifying communities to prove their demand with the prize of  BT enabling the five most ardent areas. With smaller exchanges excluded, this is more likely to allow a very small number of people to jump a queue they didn’t know they were already in, and by my calculation the lucky communities are more likely to get 4 numbers or more on the National Lottery than win BT’s prize.

The slow build of investment in the UK is becoming an emotive debate. While BT’s announcements of new areas help to demonstrate real progress, spin like BT Retail’s “Race to Infinity” competition are more likely to further stoke emotions.



Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Switch to our mobile site

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin